Unionized Public
Schools: Classic Mediocrity
My 30-year
service as a public school teacher began in 1957. In 1970, the Los Angeles
teachers' union, UTLA, called a strike. Their attempt to close the schools
met failure in view of the largely professional viewpoint of a great
majority of the L.A. teachers at the time.
Through the
following years, the several teachers' organizations continued to represent
their members before the school board on a proportional basis of membership
as the Winton Act required. The union continued an ongoing drumbeat
to the teachers that they would have "more clout" if they
would join the union. They had minor success.
By the late
1970's, State Senator Rhodda authored a bill before the Senate and Assembly
that would require all teachers in every public school district to choose
a single teachers' organization to represent them. It worked!
The teachers
had accepted the union ploy of "clout." The union won and
the voice of the professional teacher was silenced - without further
representation. California public schools went from No. 1 to No. 50,
as statewide the story was repeated. Nation-wide, the NEA and AFT prevailed.
As predicted, public school education went into the toilet. Since the
first priority of any union is the benefit of the union and its members,
the students were given a backseat. Today, the publicsector blockage
of education reform continues by the unions -- private-sector organizations.(Koret
Foundation)
Ignoring the
cause, politicians, parents, and teachers today do not have a clue as
to a solution. The worker -- mentality and lack of professional identity
and values grinds on while the children of each succeeding generation
suffer ongoing classic mediocrity -- and worse.
Parents who
care will have to lead. Meanwhile, private, parochial, and homeschooling,
are the only reliable 'student first' educational institutions available.
If anyone disagrees tell 'em they're long overdue to "Put up..."
Jim Baxter
Santa Maria, California